List of 774 PGTs marked for transferred Anywhere in the state

School Education Department Haryana

Notice regarding New Teachers Transfer Policy, 2016 alongwith List of 774 PGTs marked for transferred "Anywhere in the state".

Whereas the new Teacher Transfer Policy 2016 has a vision in para 1 as reproduce below:- 

To ensure equitable, demand based distribution of teachers/ Heads to protect academic interest of students and optimise job satisfaction amongst its employees in a fair and transparent manner. 

And whereas para 2(i) provides that teachers who are members of State Cadre and District Cadre are liable to be transferred anywhere in the State and anywhere in the District respectively, at any point of time 

And whereas para 4(i) inter alia, provides that transfers can be effected by the Government at any time during the year in cases of administrative exigency. The reasons for transfers under these grounds should be recorded on file. 

And whereas para 5(i) provides that transfer/posting to the opted zone/school will not be claimed or treated as a matter of right. 

And whereas para 5(iii) provides that the option once availed and confirmed shall be final and can be changed only under the provisions of this Policy. 

And whereas para 5(v) provides that unless protected under a provision of this Policy, every teacher completing 5 years continuous stay in a particular school shall be transferred. 

And whereas the clarification order dated 21.07.2016 insofar as it concerns with para 5(v) provides that "Unless protected under a provision of this policy, every teacher completing 5 years stay/tenure in a particular school/zone of any district(s), whether independently in a district or cumulatively of more than one district, of the State shall be transferred" 

And whereas para 8(iv) provides that all teachers shall be asked to select the zones in order of their preferences, across districts. They shall further opt for a minimum five or available number of schools, whichever is more, in order of preference within each zone, so that their claim could be considered against multiple vacancies within a zone. In case he/she does not get his/her preferred choice then he/she shall be given any available school in the same zone. In case there is no school available in the said zone then he/ she will be considered for the next zone of preference and so on. 

And whereas para 8(xiii) provides that in administrative exigency, the Department shall be at liberty to post any teacher at any of the choices given by him/her, irrespective of preference given. And whereas para 9(i) provides that every teacher will be responsible for the accuracy and regular updation of data in the MIS in respect of his/ her credentials. In case he/ she notices any discrepancy, he/ she will get it rectified by adopting due procedure after producing the relevant evidences before the competent authority. He/she shall be responsible for updation of profile as and when any status is changed. 

And whereas the department asked all teachers to update their personal profile and service profile on MIS portal expeditiously so that further action for implementation of the Transfer Policy could be taken in time followed by through letters dated 06.04.2016, through video conference dated 27.04.2016 and through public notice in various newspapers dated 06.05.2016, Email dated 21.05.2016, DEO letters dated 23.05.2016, Email dated 30.05.2016, letter dated 02.06.2016 and letter dated 30.6.2016 respectively. 

And whereas most of the employees showed their willingness and alertness in completing their profiles well in time and thereby helping the Department in preparing their case in the application software for the general transfer in the spirit of Transfer Policy. Such employees timely gave their transfer preferences as per the schedule given by the department. 

And whereas in spite of a plethora of communications and requests issued to employees through various mode of communications some employees certainly didn't care, thereby faulted, for completing their personal profiles as well as the service profile for which they were specifically enjoined upon in the policy as well as in the communications mentioned here in above. Such employees even didn't give transfer preferences. The list of such employees is enclosed herewith as annexure-I. As the Application Software has to implement the spirit of the policy hence such teachers would necessarily be allocated new stations. 

And whereas these few employees who didn't/couldn't complete their profile or didn't give transfer preferences, for one reason or the other, cannot be permitted to hold up the entire process of transfers through digital mode for which almost all other teachers are waiting impatiently. 

And whereas to allocate stations to such teachers the department devised a logic whereby these teachers have been given stations in order of merit in the zone as near as possible to the present place of posting of such teachers who didn't express their options even though such teachers were otherwise liable to be transfer from their present place of posting. And whereas, some of these defaulting teachers couldn't be accommodated in nearby schools. 

And whereas to save these teachers from being on road without posting and to let them to complete their MIS profiles for future service decisions like transfers, promotions, etc. the department has allocated them postings at stations available vacant and as per their eligibility in terms of the Teacher Transfer Policy 2016. 

And whereas the convenience of these teachers cannot be known by the department unless they themselves come forward and express their options and transfer preferences on the MIS profile whenever opportunity window is made open to them. 

Therefore, the department has decided that such teachers whose list is enclosed as annexure-I shall be provided another opportunity in the near future in the next phase of transfers so that they can get the convenient station as per their "willingness, weightage and eligibility".