DSE Clarification PGT Transfer Drive 02.08.2016

OFFICE OF DIRECTOR SECONDARY EDUCATION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA 

In view of the directions given by Hon'ble High Court on 1.8.2016, to bring about all transparency and fairness in generating the Transfers of PGTs, the following activities have been conducted/are to be conducted by the Department:- 

A: Activities conducted on 1.8.2016 and 2.8.2016: 

Approval of Service profile of 109 PGTs, who had submitted their profile but was not approved their approving authority. Since the Service profile of such PGTs has been approved on the basis of information given by the employees themselves and no record was available at State Headquarters, the onus of accuracy of data filled up by the employee concerned will lie with the PGT concerned. List of such employees is attached at Annexure-I. Some TGTs were promoted in the month of April, May, and June, 2016 to the post of PGTs but some of them had represented to directorate that due to various reasons, their promotion was not incorporated in the MIS Portal. Cases identified at State headquarters were examined and data of 13 such employees was updated as PGTs, list of which is attached at Annexure-II. The above activities have been conducted upto 4.00 P.M. on 2.8.2016. The option of giving online choices of zones and schools will be available w.e.f. 5.00 P.M. on 2.8.2016 to 3.8.2016 upto 5.00 P.M. The following activities would be conducted during this period: 

B: Activites from 2.8.2016 (5.00 P.M. ) to 3.8.2016 upto 5.00 P.M.: 

All those Eligible PGTs, who have already submitted their option of zones and schools would be able to edit their options, if they want to do so. All those eligible PGTs, who have not yet submitted their option would also be able to give their online choices of zone and schools afresh. All those PGTs, who could not send their personal profile correction request, will be able to submit their personal profile correction request and their approving authority would be able to approve the same. List of eligible PGTs will be displayed afresh in view of the approval of Service Profile and issuance of clarification by the Department. List of Deemed vacancies will also be displayed afresh in view of the approval of service profile of more PGTs and issuance of clarification by Lou\ 9, the Department. 

C: The option of filling of choices would be closed at 5.00 P.M. on 3.8.2016. Thereafter, the following activities would be conducted:-

Displaying of Merit list of all PGTs after computation of personal "My Points" on the basis of profile correction requests sent and approved upto 3.8.2016. Generation of Provisional Allocation of schools on the basis of choices of zones and schools given by PGTs. Allocation of schools to those PGTs, who would not be able to get any school of their choice, by considering them against the remaining unallocated vacancies firstly in their district, then in surrounding districts on the basis of their merit. Manual verification of some cases on the basis of provisional allocation by a duly constituted committee. Generation of Actual allocation of schools and sending of orders in the Login of each and every PGT concerned. Providing allocation log in the login of each PGT mentioning therein each and every choice of zone and school alongwith reason of nonallocation, if any, and name of school allocated. Displaying the Allocation List on the website and sending to all concerned through emails/electronic media. 

D: Even after above exercise following types of cases would also remain unattended/unnoticed:- 

1. Service Profile is still not approved or approved on wrong Job Post/ Subject due to following reasons: Some newly promoted PGTs tried to update their new school by getting their Service Profile rejected from the Principal. But were not able to update the same due to various reasons, out of which non-availability of vacancy in the destination school was main factor. Some PGTs were unable to get their service profile approved in the given timeline (28.1.2016 to 23.6.2016 and even during 1.8.2016 to 2.8.2016). 

C. Some Vocational Lecturers, whose Service Profile has been approved on the post of PGT rather than Vocational Lecturer mistakenly. Some newly promoted PGTs whose promotion entry on MIS was wrongly made by the Directorate on a subject, other than the one on which they were promoted. 

d. Some PGTs, whose promotions have been shown on MIS L-A 2 Portal in the Cadre other than the State Cadre Educationist-II (i.e. either in Aarohi Educationist-II cadre or Mewat Educationist-II cadre) 

2. Some teachers who were transferred from one place to another and their previous school has relieved them on the portal but in new school their joining was not incorporated on the Portal by their head of institution. 

E: Due to the impact of above, some PGTs/Vocational lecturers will fall in the following categories:- 

Non-existence of the employee on the Portal resulting into showing the post occupied by them as vacant on the MIS Portal. Working in a school on ground other than the one shown on MIS portal, (profile is approved in different school). iii. Subject or Job Post on which they are working is not matching with the subject or job post they are being shown on MIs Portal. Office proposal: Cases of all such PGTs mentioned in para 'D' and 'E' above, shall be handled separately after the transfer drive one by one, either by the Directorate itself of by the concerned DEOs under supervision of the Directorate. Such PGTs/Vocational Lecturers/ Guest PGTs will be asked to submit their representation to concerned DEO, who in turn, shall prepare a list of such PGTs and verify their credentials personally and shall certify that their claim is right. Their profile shall be completed and approved by the concerned DEOs against the left out vacancies after the transfer drive in zone 6 and 7 only. Thereafter, if so decided, their options shall be taken again for their placement. F: Some miscellaneous issues are also discussed as under one by one:- 1. Mistakenly chose option of "Yes" or "No" and wanted to reverse the said choice. It is clarified that at the time of disbursement of user id and passwords, it was specifically mentioned by the department that the employees should be asked to change their password and do not share with anyone. Hence in case of breach of password by any other person than the concerned employee, if so, the onus lies with the concerned employee only. The said teachers had an opportunity to edit their option on 29 .6 . 2 016 and 30 . 6 . 2 016. Moreover, change in option of "Yes" or "No" would result in change in deemed vacancy position, which some of teachers might have already opted for. Hence such cases cannot L4, be considered. Some PGTs reported that their profile is not showing them as Associate NCC Officer. List of ANOs and schools was asked from all DEOs by the Directorate through e-mail. List of such PGTs (ANOs) has been sent to MKCL directing them to protect them at their place of posting, as per provision of the Policy. However, any other PGT, whose name does not exist in the said list or who have sent request individually or through Principal, could not have been taken care of in the absence of verification from District Education Officer concerned. Such teachers would be handled separately by the Department after receipt of grievance with facts and evidence. Queries regarding non-displaying of points for debilitating diseases: After verification of some such cases received at Directorate, it was revealed that the diseases mentioned by some teachers in their personal profile does not match with the name of disease mentioned in the letter notifying the diseases of debilitating disorder. Hence to lessen such grievances it is clarified that only those diseases would be considered automatically by the Computer which have been notified by the Department and updated by the employee in their personal profile duly approved by the approving authority. 4. Promotion of C&V Teachers to the posts of PGTs and their cancellation due to stay order by Hon'ble Court - one case emp ID 000186 come to notice. Such cases shall also be considered separately and it is clarified that if any such employee has been considered mistakenly/inadvertently as PGT, he/she may consider himself/ herself as a C86V in the concerned subject. This is for information of all concerned.